Jump to content
OneHallyu Will Be Closing End Of 2023 ×
OneHallyu

CeeLo Green deletes Twitter account following rape comments


Matro

Recommended Posts

CeeLo Green has deleted his Twitter account after posting a series of tweets relating to a recent court case in which he pleaded no contest to supplying ecstasy to a woman. 

Green escaped jail time last month after pleading no contest to drugs charges. The singer was accused of secretly slipping ecstasy into the drink of his dinner date at a sushi restaurant in July 2012, and was sentenced to three years of formal probation and ordered to complete 360 hours of community service.

An earlier rape charge relating to the same alleged incident was dropped due to insufficient evidence. 

Yesterday (September 1), as Billboard reports, Green deleted two tweets prior to removing his whole account in which he is alleged to have written: "People who have really been raped REMEMBER!!!" and "If someone is passed out they're not even WITH you consciously! so WITH Implies consent."

The Gnarls Barkley singer is then alleged to have gone on to tweet: "Let me 1st praise god for exoneration fairness & freedom! Secondly I sincerely apologize for my comments being taken so far out of context."

He reportedly added: "I only intended on a healthy exchange to help heal those who love me from the pain I had already caused from this. Please forgive me as it was your support that got me thru this to begin with. I'd never condone the harm of any women. Thank you."

However, at the time of writing (September 2), the account is inaccessible and appears to have been deleted. 
cr. Nme.com

 

 

 

 

 

Disgusting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"People who have really been raped REMEMBER!!!" and "If someone is passed out they're not even WITH you consciously! so WITH Implies consent."

 

I know that's English but I'm konphuzed. Does he mean that although they're not with you consciously, if they're with you from the start, it doesn't matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"People who have really been raped REMEMBER!!!" and "If someone is passed out they're not even WITH you consciously! so WITH Implies consent."

 

I know that's English but I'm konphuzed. Does he mean that although they're not with you consciously, if they're with you from the start, it doesn't matter?

 

 

"If someone is passed out they're not even WITH you consciously! so WITH Implies consent."

 

What??

 

 

What does this even mean. 

 

 

i cant understand this, is he drunk while writing it??

 

 

Read between the lines, basically he is poking fun at the rape victim for not being able to clearly remember being raped because she was drugged (ecstasy). He puts emphasis on (REMEMBER) by capitalizing the word, clearly showing intent and attacking the victim. Further he says because the victim was with him unconsciously than it was consensual, emphasis on the capitalization of (WITH) and the fact that he said "WITH implies consent." So basically he is admitting to the rape and drugging of these women. I guess he thought he was being really clever in his tweets and no one could get what he was really trying to say but it backfired on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read between the lines, basically he is poking fun at the rape victim for not being able to clearly remember being raped because she was drugged (ecstasy). He puts emphasis on (REMEMBER) by capitalizing the word, clearly showing intent and attacking the victim. Further he says because the victim was with him unconsciously than it was consensual, emphasis on the capitalization of (WITH) and the fact that he said "WITH implies consent." So basically he is admitting to the rape and drugging of these women. I guess he thought he was being really clever in his tweets and no one could get what he was really trying to say but it backfired on him.

 

I see, thank you. I couldn't understand what he was saying but it's pretty clear now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read between the lines, basically he is poking fun at the rape victim for not being able to clearly remember being raped because she was drugged (ecstasy). He puts emphasis on (REMEMBER) by capitalizing the word, clearly showing intent and attacking the victim. Further he says because the victim was with him unconsciously than it was consensual, emphasis on the capitalization of (WITH) and the fact that he said "WITH implies consent." So basically he is admitting to the rape and drugging of these women. I guess he thought he was being really clever in his tweets and no one could get what he was really trying to say but it backfired on him.

I got the first one with the "Remember" but I dont see how being uncounscious means its consensual?

Like she didnt say no so its okay??

 

Disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Back to Top