Jump to content
OneHallyu Will Be Closing End Of 2023 ×
OneHallyu

(Pannattic) Looking closer into JBJ95's lawsuit ... "Breach of contract due to negligence" Lost 900M KRW in damages


CannotBNamed

Recommended Posts

download%20(49).jpeg

 According to the court, Kim Sang-gyun should pay 220M KRW and Takada Kenta 665M KRW to Star Road Ent. for damages that have been caused, the rest of the claims from Star Road Ent. are dismissed. Previously, Star Road Ent. filed a lawsuit against Kim Sang-gyun for 800M KRW and Takada Kenta for 1,7B KRW for damages. They claimed, "We don't accept their claim saying that we have failed to support their activities in the entertainment industry. The company's financial situation deteriorated in 2020 as an aftermath of COVID-19 pandemic. It's not because the company is not doing their job properly.

The court explained, "Some lessons like acting class were stopped due to the company's financial situations, but those were not lessons that are necessary." The court also added, "Kim Sang-gyun and Takada Kenta are the ones who breached the exclusive contract. Instead of breaking the contract one-sidedly, they should've used their talent and skill to continue activities in the entertainment industry". In addition, the court said, "We think they were already given a clear explanation and advance notice about the online concert"

On the issue of JBJ95's claim of unpaid wages and breach of an exclusive contract, the court explained, "After Star Road Ent.'s staff resigned, the CEO voluntarily replaced the place of JBJ95's manager and worked really hard to plan and organize for their online concerts. Therefore, JBJ95 is the one who is responsible for the breach of an exclusive contract"

theqoo

-"Instead of breaking the contract one-sidedly, they should've used their talent and skill to engage in activities in the entertainment industry" --> I doubted my eyes for a second. Are they saying that JBJ95 is not putting any effort here?

-They should've performed in the middle of the lawsuit, though...ㅠㅠ

-They shouldn't have missed the concert just because they're filing a lawsuit. It's too bad, but there's nothing they can do right nowㅠ

-I wonder why did they decide to not attend their schedules...

-Did their lawyer not tell them that they shouldn't be skipping their concert?ㅠㅠ Even Chu doesn't miss her schedule in the midst of all. That's too bad.

-I think the damages were even bigger because they missed their concert...

-They were already notified about the online concert, but they refused to perform. That's why they caused even more damages for the company and therefore couldn't win the lawsuit.

-They should've performed even when they're filing the lawsuit, just like Chu. I wonder why they refused to perform. Did their lawyer not tell them about this?

-After reading the explanation from the court, I have to admit that they're the ones at fault here...

-Skipping concert only put them at bigger risk to lose the lawsuit, oh gosh...

  • Crying 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm baffled by the fact that even if you're suing your company for an invalid contract, you still need to uphold the entire contract until it is settled in court?? That's nonsensical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick search says that for breach of contract, the suing party still needs to fulfill their contract until the resolution, so I’m guessing that’s why they owe money now. It seems like a lawyer would know that so what happened?
 

I wonder why Kenta owes so much more. I feel for him e most given it’s a foreign country and new language. 
 

Curious to see what happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CannotBNamed said:

Instead of breaking the contract one-sidedly, they should've used their talent and skill to continue activities in the entertainment industry". In addition, the court said, "We think they were already given a clear explanation and advance notice about the online concert"

Pos judge, even if some points are legally sound, this is total and utter bs from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This tweet explains a bit more

https://twitter.com/tmikpop/status/1584664521649819649?s=20&t=8qmUGzdmgfrSIRl7lvhMlQ

 

 

I dunno it just seems crazy they would be required to work unpaid. The whole thing sucks, but hopefully they can work and promote again. Still, owing what amounts to a mortgage in damages seems excessive. Like, that’s a really expensive concert to hold when apparently the company didn’t have much money to begin with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Back to Top