breakout 156 Posted June 23, 2020 Share Posted June 23, 2020 (edited) whats stopping sm to sue the informant ? and the fact that the victim had to stand up for him against the harassment of this informant is CRAZY. the person even wrote that he wasnt a victim Edited June 23, 2020 by breakout 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
breakout 156 Posted June 23, 2020 Share Posted June 23, 2020 32 minutes ago, HRH Ayyu said: This is giving me a headace So op is a third person. Not the victim and not the informate. But someone who a classmate/knows taeyong nuna. From what i gather they are saying the informant " A" was the one who made a big deal out of what happened when they were in school n The victim B wasent as bothered originally. I think beacuse the victim "B" signed a non disclosure they cant publicly comment either way. I think what's happening now is about A getting harrassed by taeyong fans(which was shitty) and wanting compensation. N A is dragging B into this mess. Even if B thought the apology wasent sincere, there is no benefit for her to bring all this up again when a settlement had been reached n there being a massive penalty attached. The informant has not talked about B getting harrassed, only the informant about themselve. This is now about the informant n SM/taeyong. The informant never got any compensation etc cant you read the title? the op is the one directly involved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now