So let's agree that a bait article mentioning other groups isn't always the company's mediaplay then?

[iori]

Because I have receipts when oh-ers bash on yg and blackpink whenever a bait article come out, nevermind that yg mediaplay is almost always exclusively released from osen, and that those articles comes from random sources

 

I'd like to spread awareness that you need to clarify the sources before claiming some company do the evil mediaplay

Thanks

[Daddy Marx]

What is this about

[iori]

What is this about

its about yg that was accused using other groups name to mediaplay blackpink

[Daddy Marx]

its about yg that was accused using other groups name to mediaplay blackpink

 

I mean I got that, I just meant like why mention it now, I thought it's something people have talked about before

[iori]

I mean I got that, I just meant like why mention it now, I thought it's something people have talked about before

where? I only watched how different the reaction when the previous article about other group come out and thought of this

[Hibiscus]

can you imagine companys being involved in every. single. aricle. about their signed acts? it's impossible. I though this was agreed on, magazines have their own say, good or bad, since it's well, their own content, and they can sometimes even mess up and get industry people mad.

[Daddy Marx]

where? I only watched how different the reaction when the previous article about other group come out and thought of this

What previous article though?? I didn't see any previous article recently, that's what I was trying to ask

[lovSalah]

" bighit is saint "

 

 

 

~ deluded koreaboo army ~

[iori]

What previous article though?? I didn't see any previous article recently, that's what I was trying to ask

the pannchoa article about exo and bts

[classiq]

which previous article are you referring to?

 

" bighit is saint "



~ deluded koreaboo army ~

 

huh?

[love&pink]

yg the most powerful man on the planet the way some people be talking....... giving that idiot too much credit 

[NCT48]

Why are people in here acting dumb like they don't know what this was made in reference to lmfao

[classiq]

the pannchoa article about exo and bts

 

are you talking about the book one?

thats an unauthorized book written by an author. it has no official links to the group & company

 

unauthorized books about celebs is a common thing

[Daddy Marx]

the pannchoa article about exo and bts

That wasn't media play lmaaooo, it was someone criticising something a random and unofficial book no-one had heard of had said about BTS

[iori]

That wasn't media play lmaaooo, it was someone criticising something a random and unofficial book no-one had heard of had said about BTS

that's why i said we need to clarify the source, the netizens did great at that article, but we know how people bash bpyg when an article that come out of nowhere using both names

[Daddy Marx]

Why are people in here acting dumb like they don't know what this was made in reference to lmfao

Now now Sean  

[iori]

are you talking about the book one?

thats an unauthorized book written by an author. it has no official links to the group & company

 

unauthorized books about celebs is a common thing

The article also unauthorized by yg, from unknown writers, has no official links to yg (only osen has)

[classiq]

The article also unauthorized by yg, from unknown writers, has no official links to yg (only osen has)

 

I was just confused as to how you viewed a passage from a book, that was posted on pann, as a mediaplay article tbh

[remembering]

can you imagine companys being involved in every. single. aricle. about their signed acts? it's impossible. I though this was agreed on, magazines have their own say, good or bad, since it's well, their own content, and they can sometimes even mess up and get industry people mad.

I think some just understood this very simple statement.

[remembering]

are you talking about the book one?

thats an unauthorized book written by an author. it has no official links to the group & company

 

unauthorized books about celebs is a common thing

So are many articles but some people are so ready to accuse everyone else of media play

[classiq]

So are many articles but some people are so ready to accuse everyone else of media play

 i'm not talking about that. she mentioned a specific thread & I was referring to that thread.

[iori]

I was just confused as to how you viewed a passage from a book, that was posted on pann, as a mediaplay article tbh

if you remember an article about ygbp and other groups also because it was posted on pann

If you don't get why i need to do this, just take it like this

Do you think its stupid to call that book from nowhere a mediaplay?

I also think an article from nowhere is mediaplay by yg is stupid too.

[namidaone]

but aren't pannchoa articles written by knetz not journalists? and it was reacting abt a book not an article. 

i think a better example of a pro-yg bait article that wasn't sponsored by the co was the "Minzy exit not affecting yg stocks article" 

[classiq]

if you remember an article about ygbp and other groups also because it was posted on pann

If you don't get why i need to do this, just take it like this

Do you think its stupid to call that book from nowhere a mediaplay?

I also think an article from nowhere is mediaplay by yg is stupid too.

 

I feel like we are talking about two different things. Of course there are articles from nowhere that have no relation to the company. I agree with you on that point

 

But the post about the book was not mediaplay.

 

The post on pann is the same as if I posted a topic on OH about Harry Potter. Meanwhile, I wouldnt be doing mediaplay for Harry Potter though

[iori]

i'm not talking about that. she mentioned a specific thread & I was referring to that thread.

The article response trigger me somehow ngl, its like finally people have common sense to think its absurd a company would pay for that