Jump to content
OneHallyu Will Be Closing End Of 2023 ×
OneHallyu

Is queerness inherently inappropriate?


enchante

Recommended Posts

Just kind of wanted to voice my thoughts on this and hear yours tbh.

 

I’ve seen some people say children shouldn’t be exposed to the lgbt spectrum because it is abnormal and children should be given time to grow before they learn about it. Personally to put it the nicest I can this is a load of horse crap, to children who grow up with homosexual parents nothing about it seems dirty to them it’s just their parents. In that same strand I believe children are taught prejudice and not born with it.

 

Let me know your opinion on the matter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homosexuality isn't even anything shocking, just tell the kids about it

Exactly. When my dad told me what it meant when someone is gay or a lesbian he didn't beat around the bush about it; He just told me what it was and how some people just like what they like and that was it. It's parents who treat it like it's something to be afraid of or feared that give it stigma and cause it to seem "inappropriate". If you treat something like it's something to be feared or taboo, then it's going to be seen as something taboo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LGBT is not abnormal, it's less common than heterosexuality, that's it!

basically this, and children are perfectly capable of comprehending that love is a universal thing, perhaps even more so than adults sometimes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok the problem is that these homophobes (because people who say that showing something other than heterosexuality is inappropriate is homophobe in my book) associate being gay/bi/lesbian with sex only and completely overlook the fact that these sexual orientations are not just about sex and involves romantic attraction/feelings too. Just like heterosexuality. So if heterosexuality isn't seen as inapropriate I don't see why homosexuality/bisexuality should be.

 

LGBT is not abnormal, it's less common than heterosexuality, that's it!

Source ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intentionally not exposing your kids to gay shit would make some of them think there may be something inherently wrong with it so thats why their parents are trying to keep em away

 

 

Just tell your kids about gay people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok the problem is that these homophobes (because people who say that showing something other than heterosexuality is inappropriate is homophobe in my book) associate being gay/bi/lesbian with sex only and completely overlook the fact that these sexual orientations are not just about sex and involves romantic attraction/feelings too. Just like heterosexuality. So if heterosexuality isn't seen as inapropriate I don't see why homosexuality/bisexuality should be.

 

Source ?

it's not a worldwide demographics but USA is a great example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's not a worldwide demographics but USA is a great example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

Thank you. But most of these surveys aren't even really representative because they really give an answer the question "what percentage of the adult population is openly gay" and don't take a looot of factors into account.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you should be telling s 4 year old about sexual attraction

It’s not sexual attraction but orientation. Nobody is telling they’re kids “hey sometimes guys blow other guys and that okay!†I’m asking if lgbt sexualities are inherently a dirty thing that children shouldn’t be exposed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its stems from the fact that religious people use the "sex is for reproduction, not pleasure" argument against homosexuality -- but if that was the case then we wouldn't have developed to have stimulus around sexual reproductive organs. In fact, its been proven that animals NEED the stimuli to have sex. Basically, animals (and humans) evolved to have sex for pleasure more than for offspring.

 

Thus, by their logic, heterosexual couples who don't want to have children OR have sex for any other reason other than to have children should be as "sinful" as homosexual couples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually overheard a heartwarming discussion once in a park. A mother with her small daughter (couldn't be older than 5 I think) were sitting on a bench and not far from them on another bench were 2 girls holding hands and at a point they kissed. The kid then pointed at them and said something like "Look mom, they love each other! I didn't know girls could too!" to which the mother responded "Yes they can, boys too" and the small girl was so surprised and kept going on and on about how cute the couple was asndsjf 

 

Kids know what love is and they'll understand, anyone using that excuse is clearly homophobic.

 

Would you also not let your kids see interacial marriages because they're also inherently "inappropriate?" Like wtf 0u0plz.png

 

Anyone who actually thinks this is seriously problematic

They probably used to be seen like that years ago tho.... I guess it's just a matter of time till lgbt+ people won't be seen as "not normal"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its stems from the fact that religious people use the "sex is for reproduction, not pleasure" argument against homosexuality -- but if that was the case then we wouldn't have developed to have stimulus around sexual reproductive organs. In fact, its been proven that animals NEED the stimuli to have sex. Basically, animals (and humans) evolved to have sex for pleasure more than for offspring.

 

Thus, by their logic, heterosexual couples who don't want to have children OR have sex for any other reason other than to have children should be as "sinful" as homosexual couples.

 

I don't know any religious people who deny the pleasure aspect of sex tbh. LOL! We acknowledge that it's purpose is mainly for reproduction....that's why you have to take extra measures if you DON'T want to reproduce; because otherwise, if you have sex, you gon' reproduce - that's what naturally occurs once everything is operating as it should. So you can't fight that; but pleasure is also a part of that...most religious people I know, acknowledge, embrace and promote that, once it's within marriage. 

 

What most religions find wrong with homosexuality, is that it deviates from what is seen by most religions as a natural design for home, family and ultimately society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Back to Top