Rio224 300 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I support it,even though it violates their rights...if they decide to do drugs the baby has no choice but to take drugs with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delincious 5,654 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I don't agree. If there is suspicion of drug abuse and a warrant, aka the regular procedure then yes. Otherwise no that's just intrusive and a serious violation of your rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShawolSONEexo 2,135 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 yes somewhat, just because the mom is a dumbass doesn't mean the baby has to suffer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Symphonyâ„¢ 11,329 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Sometimes it can be a over the counter drug to cause a positive test. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Shadow 727 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Its a good idea. I've seen first hand innocent children having to deal with their drug addict parents, and its not pretty. Why should a child have to deal with ur bs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milup 1,920 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 did you print this out and tape it to your bedroom door? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gayjibae 471 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I don't agree. If there is suspicion of drug abuse and a warrant, aka the regular procedure then yes. Otherwise no that's just intrusive and a serious violation of your rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rio224 300 Posted April 10, 2014 Author Share Posted April 10, 2014 did you print this out and tape it to your bedroom door? no,popped on my fb newsfeed from a friend that is a nurse...i have no idea if this is being implemented at her work.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloupsidou 2,047 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I don't agree. If there is suspicion of drug abuse and a warrant, aka the regular procedure then yes. Otherwise no that's just intrusive and a serious violation of your rights. This tbh you can be screened positive because you ate a bagel with poppy seeds on it three days before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAYAKA 9,964 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 i can see what they are trying to do but I don't really agree with that. I'd agree ig there were any doubt that the mother may be unfit but just outright notifying Child Services for any positive tests doesn't sound right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUILD 3,195 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 yes somewhat, just because the mom is a dumbass doesn't mean the baby has to suffer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twin<3333LovesMango 682 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 yes somewhat, just because the mom is a dumbass doesn't mean the baby has to suffer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveYouRight.EXO 159 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
�SHERRY� 5,081 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 If the mother is really a druggies then yes i agree but if the result is positive due something else that is legal and harmless then that not fair for the mothers.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blinket 2,355 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 druggies could easily work around that & i'ts not fair to other mothers... but it's not such a big deal so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denalichen 403 Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 They could argue that this is aimed at a particular segment of society. Instead of generally testing everyone though, it would be more effective to help high-risk mothers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceHism 536 Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 This is really dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamguu 374 Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 They mean well, but do we really want this much government intervention? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIM£ 2,060 Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 This would just discourage them to go to hospitals causing more problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.