Jump to content
OneHallyu Will Be Closing End Of 2023 ×
OneHallyu

[soompi] Park Yoochun’s Accuser Deemed Not Guilty Of False Accusation

bb4

By bb4
in Celebrity News & Gossip

Recommended Posts

bb4 Legend

bb4

25,058
Posted
Posted

Park Yoochun’s Accuser Deemed Not Guilty Of False Accusation

 

park-yoochun.jpg

 

Early July 2017, Ms. Song, one of the women who accused JYJ’s Park Yoochun of sexual assault in 2016, was found not guilty of false accusation and defamation by a unanimous jury vote. Prosecution appealed the not-guilty ruling, and the first trial of the appeal was held early September, at which time prosecution made their case about why the initial ruling should be overturned.

 

During the final trial, held September 21, the judge panel ruled to uphold the initial ruling of not guilty, saying that Ms. Song’s sexual assault lawsuit was not completely groundless, considering Ms. Song’s claims as well as witness testimonies, and that there is not enough evidence to prove that her accusations were false: “False accusation is acknowledged when the accusation directly goes against an objective fact, but it’s difficult to say that the intercourse was consensual based on Park Yoochun’s claims alone.â€

 

Following the ruling, Park Yoochun’s legal representative revealed in an official statement released to media that they intend to see Ms. Song in court again: “The not guilty ruling of [Ms. Song] is completely unjust. We look forward to seeing a proper ruling in the Supreme Court. We will also be taking strict legal action against unfounded rumors and false statements about Park Yoochun that spread online and through other mediums.â€

 

Source (1) (2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sumikosan Nation's First Love

sumikosan

18,310
Posted
Posted

Okay I am going to set this straight once more. She is found to be not guilty due to insufficient evidences presented by the prosecutors. In a criminal trial... the defendant who is Song need not prove herself innocent. It is the duty of the prosecutors who charged her to give enough evidence beyond the reasonable doubt that she is guilty. In SK it has to be more than 80% weighing for the guilty charge ruling.. So in this case... the court ruled that they agreed that she has given false accusation but the evidence is not enough to convict her. In such a case she will then be acquitted. here is the response from Cjes  thru their lawyers

 

"Park yuchun's agency, CJes Entertainment, said in an official press release  thru the legal representative, "It is very unfair to convict a false accuser (Song) of not guilty, and we are looking forward to a fair judgment in the Supreme Court."

 

"We are going to strongly respond to the false claims and rumors about Park Yoochun in the future on the internet"

 

so do research the law before talking nonsense again .Also Yuchun was not even charged at all by the prosecutor. In the law there is a difference... He is found innocent not acquitted as he does not have a charge by the prosecutor against him .He did not even reach the trial as a defendant but as a victim as said by the judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cheolbong supremacy Superstar

cheolbong supremacy

16,576
Posted
Posted

Okay I am going to set this straight once more. She is found to be not guilty due to insufficient evidences presented by the prosecutors. In a criminal trial... the defendant who is Song need not prove herself innocent. It is the duty of the prosecutors who charged her to give enough evidence beyond the reasonable doubt that she is guilty. In SK it has to be more than 80% weighing for the guilty charge ruling.. So in this case... the court ruled that they agreed that she has given false accusation but the evidence is not enough to convict her. In such a case she will then be acquitted. here is the response from Cjes thru their lawyers

 

"Park yuchun's agency, CJes Entertainment, said in an official press release thru the legal representative, "It is very unfair to convict a false accuser (Song) of not guilty, and we are looking forward to a fair judgment in the Supreme Court."

 

"We are going to strongly respond to the false claims and rumors about Park Yoochun in the future on the internet"

 

so do research the law before talking nonsense again .Also Yuchun was not even charged at all by the prosecutor. In the law there is a difference... He is found innocent not acquitted as he does not have a charge by the prosecutor against him before the trial.

 

I love how you dont mention that for rape to be considered "rape" in korea the victim has to prove signs of "struggle" a simple "NO" is not enough. Consent? What's that? At the same time, if you hurt your rapist while struggling HE can charge you. Now tell me agaim how exactly the law is on the victims side, hmm?

 

LINKS once again for the delulus and rapist apologists bc im fucking tired of yall closing your eyes and excusing rape and blaming potential victims.

 

"South Korea, the country where rape of foreign women is 'ignored' "

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11643186

"Raped and alone in a foreign land"

 

http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130423001036

 

"Let's Talk About the Toxic Way South Korea Is Handling its Rape Problem"

https://www.vice.com/en_au/article/yvjnjg/south-koreas-rape-problem-is-actually-a-gender-inequality-problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Teru Legend

Teru

22,363
Posted
Posted

what else is there to say tbh. there's simply no reason she would randomly lie. what has she to gain from it?

 

So in this case... the court ruled that they agreed that she has given false accusation but the evidence is not enough to convict her. In such a case she will then be acquitted. here is the response from Cjes  thru their lawyers

 

lol this is such bullshit and you know it. when will you stop posting your own made up interpretation of events and trying to pass it off as legit fact

 

if this is really the case (it isn't) then the same could be said in the initial trail that they all emphatically agreed Yoochun assaulted this woman but there wasn't enough evidence to prove it so they had no choice but to acquit (I'm not saying this is what happened but if you genuinely think the tripe you just wrote above is accurate then it would logically be the same for him too).

 

but that wouldn't suit your narrative now would it

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Teru Legend

Teru

22,363
Posted
Posted

Do your research before talking nonsense again

 

don't worry, I'll just sit here and anticipate your next post that will probably be copy-pasted from a fan blog claiming they're a professional lawyer, CEO and financial advisor with proof that this is all just a government coverup orchestrated by mysterious unseen forces, anything else that indicates he might actually be a predator would be too far-fetched of course

 

that or maybe you're going to reveal you're also an experienced medium now considering you seem to know what the courts, judge and jury are thinking without any sources or evidence whatsoever

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cheolbong supremacy Superstar

cheolbong supremacy

16,576
Posted
Posted

don't worry, I'll just sit here and anticipate your next post that will probably be copy-pasted from a fan blog claiming they're a professional lawyer, CEO and financial advisor with proof that this is all just a government coverup orchestrated by mysterious unseen forces, anything else that indicates he might actually be a predator would be too far-fetched of course

 

that or maybe you're going to reveal you're also an experienced medium now considering you seem to know what the courts, judge and jury are thinking without any sources or evidence whatsoever

Oh look! "Oppa is an innocent rapist, blame the evil victim" neg squad is already here lmao (upvoted you)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Teru Legend

Teru

22,363
Posted
Posted

Oh look! "Oppa is an innocent rapist, blame the evil victim" neg squad is already here lmao (upvoted you)

 

haha thanks, though I'm not concerned about negs anyway cause the posts speak for themselves...

 

I know they all think I have some personal vendetta against Yoochun because I hate that he's popular and famous or something, and they seem to be unable to see this as anything but a scandal to be used as leverage in some dumb kpop fandom rivalry because I must have an ulterior motive due to who I stan, but I just can't understand not being infuriated by rape and sexual assault and how obviously shitty the law and world in general is for victims and survivors, especially women. it's so obvious and glaring to me I don't know how anyone else can't see it, and would even choose to believe some ridiculous bullshit instead.

 

it doesn't matter who the idol is, if it were anyone else in his shoes it would still disgust and aggravate me. unfortunately it happens to be him, so I get to experience the additional feelings of betrayal and disappointment as a former fan, on top of suddenly tainted memories and a weird embarrassment of my old affectionate posts about him. it's not fun for anyone, not least the poor woman putting everything she has on the line to try and see that justice is served, and at no real personal benefit to her whatsoever.

 

the whole thing really just boggles my mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

 Accept Cookies  Reject Cookies
Back to Top