Arthur Morgan 3,556 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/784889035235946496 Mess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Rain 1,501 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Mess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanners 1,054 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 She's so smart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vais 10,255 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This is a "major bomb"? Lmao wikileaks is trying so hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ethereal 20,923 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 but idg what's wrong with that? it's political strategy. they knew she'd have a good chance of beating him if he became the candidate for republicans. what do you think trump's campaign emails looked like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coward 1,968 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 it only matters becasue of people who bought into it. if he hadn't won the party's nomination, it wouldn't have mattered one bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC3 3,339 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This is a "major bomb"? Lmao wikileaks is trying so hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 She's so smart I think the word your looking for is cunning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VANTE 4,595 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This is a "major bomb"? Lmao wikileaks is trying so hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanners 1,054 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 I think the word your looking for is cunning Of course. Also crafty, shrewd, and scheming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 but idg what's wrong with that? it's political strategy. they knew she'd have a good chance of beating him if he became the candidate for republicans. what do you think trump's campaign emails looked like You're right it's a good political strategy, especially seeing how trump is probs the only candidate she can beat. So I don't find this shocking. But I can see how some people might not like this, because its another spit in the face of democracy, in the context of this election, and just generally with the entire election system in the US. It just shows clearly, once again, that politicians are not looking out for the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexi.K 3,161 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Basically: Lmao fuck democracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gretchen 201 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 I don't see anything wrong with this it's a strategy, where's the major bomb? Trump's campaign relies on trolls, memes, and clickbait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Of course. Also crafty, shrewd, and scheming lol. Ugghhh. I can't stand Hillary Clinton. But it's either her or a unhinged wildcard. Both candidates are terrible in my opinion. How the hell do you deal as Americans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Basically: Lmao fuck democracy. That's why I can't feel bad if Hillary loses. But that's looking less likely. But then again I'm not an American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ethereal 20,923 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 You're right it's a good political strategy, especially seeing how trump is probs the only candidate she can beat. So I don't find this shocking. But I can see how some people might not like this, because its another spit in the face of democracy, in the context of this election, and just generally with the entire election system in the US. It just shows clearly, once again, that politicians are not looking out for the people. uh, she could easily beat jeb bush, ben carson, and ted cruz too tho tbph. they're all the same, every one of them. i personally think just by being a democratic candidate she's looking out for the people. republicans just want to get back into office so that they can undo every last thing obama did and send us back in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 uh, she could easily beat jeb bush, ben carson, and ted cruz too tho tbph. they're all the same, every one of them. i personally think just by being a democratic candidate she's looking out for the people. republicans just want to get back into office so that they can undo every last thing obama did and send us back in time. Jeb bush has about much charisma as a mop and nobody wants another bush. Ben Carson is legit crazy. But im not sure about ted cruz. and Kasich might have been able to beat her. But more importantly do you know Hillary's record. She's not looking out for you. Sorry to say it. Don't confuse not being as crazy and self-serving as the republicans as being for the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ethereal 20,923 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Jeb bush has about much charisma as a mop and nobody wants another bush. Ben Carson is legit crazy. But im not sure about ted cruz. and Kasich might have been able to beat her. But more importantly do you know Hillary's record. She's not looking out for you. Sorry to say it. Don't confuse not being as crazy and self-serving as the republicans as being for the people. ted cruz's ideals are worse than trumps's tho. he's as right-wing as it gets. and at this point i'm not looking at the individuals, i'm looking at the political party. i personally will always vote democratic. i don't think clinton is even that terrible when it comes down to everything either. and i'm not going to abstain from voting so... literally though, republicans are all about big businesses and lowering cooperate taxes and calling global warming fake. at least you can usually trust a democrat to do something good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanners 1,054 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 lol. Ugghhh. I can't stand Hillary Clinton. But it's either her or a unhinged wildcard. Both candidates are terrible in my opinion. How the hell do you deal as Americans. I love her, but I understand why people don't like her. She's 100% a politician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 ted cruz's ideals are worse than trumps's tho. he's as right-wing as it gets. and at this point i'm not looking at the individuals, i'm looking at the political party. i personally will always vote democratic. i don't think clinton is even that terrible when it comes down to everything either. and i'm not going to abstain from voting so... literally though, republicans are all about big businesses and lowering cooperate taxes and calling global warming fake. at least you can usually trust a democrat to do something good. Oh I know ted cruz is crazy, but that's what the Republican base wanted the election. Trump is way better then Cruz, but I still think Cruz would have had a chance to beat Hillary, because unfortunately ideals don't decide elections. Clinton is really that terrible, but that's my opinion. With the exception of social issues, she might as well be a moderate republican. And some of social issue difference is because she's a democrat. For example, she only came out in support of same sex marriage in 2013. For the most point Hillary will say the right things, but won'table to do much. If she wins she can't piss her corporate donors of too much because she'll need to run again. Oh and she'll say climate change is real, while doing things that make it worse. I don't know what's important to you but some of Hillary's record. She voted for the Iraq war and only said that vote was a mistake in the last couple of years. She voted for the Patriot act. She voted for a border fence along the mexico along with added security and sensors. She's a politician through and through. Doesn't stand up for anything. And goes where the money is and the political winds take her. Just know what you're voting for, not just what you're voting against. I love her, but I understand why people don't like her. She's 100% a politician. But she has a terrible record, and she's not great at making people like her. So why? if you don't mind me asking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanners 1,054 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Oh I know ted cruz is crazy, but that's what the Republican base wanted the election. Trump is way better then Cruz, but I still think Cruz would have had a chance to beat Hillary, because unfortunately ideals don't decide elections. Clinton is really that terrible, but that's my opinion. With the exception of social issues, she might as well be a moderate republican. And some of social issue difference is because she's a democrat. For example, she only came out in support of same sex marriage in 2013. For the most point Hillary will say the right things, but won'table to do much. If she wins she can't piss her corporate donors of too much because she'll need to run again. Oh and she'll say climate change is real, while doing things that make it worse. I don't know what's important to you but some of Hillary's record. She voted for the Iraq war and only said that vote was a mistake in the last couple of years. She voted for the Patriot act. She voted for a border fence along the mexico along with added security and sensors. She's a politician through and through. Doesn't stand up for anything. And goes where the money is and the political winds take her. Just know what you're voting for, not just what you're voting against. But she has a terrible record, and she's not great at making people like her. So why? if you don't mind me asking Terrible record of what? And I've never cared about my politicians being likable to other people. There are lots of people who are likeable but are the worst, like Bush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsunel 147 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 Terrible record of what? And I've never cared about my politicians being likable to other people. There are lots of people who are likeable but are the worst, like Bush. Personally, know what she has voted for and what she has stood for I couldn't vote for her. For me the Iraq war vote and the Patriot act vote would be deal breakers. If I factor what Bill Clinton did as president. It gets worse. But she is not her husband, so I don't give it too much thought. Being likable shouldn't be important but it is. Especially to a politician. And I thought you said she was 100% politician. As you pointed out with Bush being likable is sometimes more important than substance. But Hillary Clinton is not that likable and to me at least, is also lacking in substance department. So I asked why do you like her. But you didn't give me an answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slutty Mathlete 900 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This bomb is a dud. All politicians work to try and hand pick their opposition. Why do think it's so popular to vote in the opposite primary from your party, to vote for the weakest candidate. That's one of the reason that Bernie Sanders did so well. He had Republican PACs that paid for campaign ads for him. It's one of the oldest strategy in the books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BABOGIRL 5,414 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 This is a "major bomb"? Lmao wikileaks is trying so hard. did you even read the entire leakage? no you didn't. among the thing's she said, one of them is "My Dream Is a Hemispheric Common Market with Open Trade and Open Border." are you looking to die? with the warmongering streak america is currently on and tensions with russia open borders is a bad idea. the countries that america has/will piss off will not hesitate to attack the country, and there will be no defense since border security is eliminated. terrorists have already managed to sneak their way in. hillary is discreet about her corruption and that's what makes her a successful politician. also said in the leaked emails, “But If Everybody's Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.†do you fully understand what it means? the "state-controlled media" has been sweeping her actions under the rug. she has been responsible for a lot of lives lost in the war. she laughed at getting a rapist off on a reduced sentence despite knowing he was guilty. after looking up both candidates' history, i must say that trump's controversies pale in comparison to what clinton has done. it's sad that the current world is driven on emotions, and don't educate themselves on what should be the priority to improve their quality of life. does the trump audio make him less qualified as president? definitely does it make clinton more qualified to be president? fuck no either way, it's a lose-lose for america That's why I can't feel bad if Hillary loses. But that's looking less likely. But then again I'm not an American. same here, the thought of her winning makes me uneasy tho. i don't wanna experience a world war in my lifetime ted cruz's ideals are worse than trumps's tho. he's as right-wing as it gets. and at this point i'm not looking at the individuals, i'm looking at the political party. i personally will always vote democratic. i don't think clinton is even that terrible when it comes down to everything either. and i'm not going to abstain from voting so... literally though, republicans are all about big businesses and lowering cooperate taxes and calling global warming fake. at least you can usually trust a democrat to do something good. my dear, hillary is only a democrat by party name. see quote above, and her actions don't speak of her stance being a "democrat" increasing corporate taxes will result to major corporations outsourcing their business abroad leading to loss of jobs for the citizens.it will also affect small business (who aren't capable of outsourcing) and would cause their business to defunct. if you think she will use the tax money for her gov't programs... i mean, the current gov't has already "accidentally" provided ISIS with millions worth of weapons and gave iran billions... Terrible record of what? And I've never cared about my politicians being likable to other people. There are lots of people who are likeable but are the worst, like Bush. you gotta start reading about your homegirl's political history... i wonder why a lot of her supporters aren't curious to find out about her past. i could list a few of her corruptions, but this post is gettiing a little too long... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delirium 4,237 Posted October 9, 2016 Share Posted October 9, 2016 What is this back and forth leaking? Trump's words got him in trouble again, so now it's time for Clinton's side to get blown up? The entire election seems to be Clinton's actions vs. Trump's mouth and his words are so bad that anything that Clinton does is seen, to many, as insignificant in comparison. Though, "secret" e-mails, warmongering, assasination plots, setting up Bernie, secret meetings, cover-ups and whatever else people claim that she had a hand in would have probably buried the republican side a long time ago, if the shoe had been on the other foot. What if Wikileaks waits until she is President and then reveals something truly horrible about her or the gov so that people will anarchy in the streets and the US will be vulnerable to outside attacks? or maybe I've watched too many movies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.