zInimiga 5,161 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Article: Stars participate in lolita pictorials... is it okay? Source: Ilgan Sports via Nate 1. [+539, -48] Pedo perverts ã…¡ã…¡ 2. [+445, -35] How is this at all considered art? Pedophilia is sexual perversion and a mental disorder. This is a straight up gravure pictorial. 3. [+445, -40] Since when did lolita become a personal taste... 4. [+60, -5] Sigh, such cheap looking pictures 5. [+58, -4] A mental disease is not art~ 6. [+52, -5] To all of you defending Rotta's work as art, then why don't you defend Go Young Wook? How is he any different from Go Young Wook? Go Young Wook put what Rotta promotes into action and was punished for it. Celebrities always try to get away with their disgusting desires by calling it art but they're no different from people like Go Young Wook who commit such acts. 7. [+48, -3] I honestly consider anyone who clicks 'like' on pictures like this as a pervert ã… makes me not want to hang out with them 8. [+43, -2] Just how much more perverted things have you all seen if you don't think that there is a pedo element to this at all? Wearing Japanese style clothing with skin exposing and a facial expression that makes them seem innocent... 9. [+35, -2] Rotta said in an interview that his name is shortened for Lolita Otaku ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ Any man who enjoys looking at pictorials by a man who is a self proclaimed lolita otaku needs to get help. 10. [+31, -3] How can viewing a young child sexually be considered a 'preference'? That's just a mental disorder. - Source: Daum 1. [+796, -129] Stuff like this needs to be exiled from the industry 2. [+540, -86] The media better not dare forgive stuff like this 3. [+464, -50] The photographer's name is Rotta... and yet you're claiming that there's nothing lolita about this? Is this a comedy? 4. [+220, -36] This is what we get for letting IU get away all these years with her lolita concept. IU started this by debuting with a perfectly planned and executed lolita concept, which hit its peak with her 'Zeze' and '23' concept. We should've gone harder in punishing her once she crossed a line that shouldn't have been crossed. I had a feeling that her concept would eventually lead to something like this, but who knew so fast? Look at everyone shooting all these lolita concept pictures now... It's not too late to demand that IU take down her songs. 5. [+178, -21] I'm sure these stars know that taking pictures like this would stir controversy and yet they did it anyway, reminding me of a certain someone.. 6. [+148, -20] These pictures look like they're out of some pedo crime... like a pedo took a bunch of pictures of young girls with their skin exposed. Dohee-ya, have you lost your mind? 7. [+138, -11] Everyone has gone mad for the money 8. [+54, -2] This photographer is so full of himself that he doesn't even seem to know right from wrong anymore ã…‹ã…‹ã…‹ He should be embarrassed but instead he's releasing more pictures like this and calling it art Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╯SHIwol╰ 2,348 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 IU's name will always be dragged here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The King 2,091 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 What exactly makes it Lolita? How old she is? Or is it the clothes? Because this looks like a pretty normal magazine photo-shoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onetooth 4,117 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 face wise and clothes wise they don't look underage to me? (i'm assuming the models are all 18+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libidinosa 2,756 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 If the girls are 18+, there shouldn't be an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piccolo's girlfriend 7,439 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 innocent looking makeup and comfy sexy clothes don't make a concept lolita imo, i think there is a line but none of these pictures cross it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilmanelric 1,123 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 What exactly makes it Lolita? How old she is? Or is it the clothes? Because this looks like a pretty normal magazine photo-shoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaehyun 1,909 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 1. [+796, -129] Stuff like this needs to be exiled from the industry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachtea 1,885 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 I honestly don't mind. But if the model themselves are under 18, then no. People need to ease up on the "everything is pedophilia!!111" mindset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airplanebyfx 102 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 if they're under 18 ew god noo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nolie 3,749 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 the girl in bottom right, isn't that wjsn chinese member? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
____shawnee 4,118 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uaena 1,895 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 4. [+220, -36] This is what we get for letting IU get away all these years with her lolita concept.. I had a feeling that her concept would eventually lead to something like this, but who knew so fast? Look at everyone shooting all these lolita concept pictures now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denizen mars 5,911 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 innocent looking makeup and comfy sexy clothes don't make a concept lolita imo, i think there is a line but none of these pictures cross it. yep I mean ideally being a singer wouldn't mean you have to do these sort of sexy photos to sell at all, but under current circumstances this isn't really that bad. I know they're young adults and they look nice IU's concept was riffing on the lolita concept, but it was doing it to be satirical and critique the fact that people did sexualize IU when she was a minor...which is what makes those comments so ridiculous. The satire just went right over their heads... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mendoan 8,110 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 the girl in bottom right, isn't that wjsn chinese member? nope its stellar members Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remus 1,775 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 10. [+31, -3] How can viewing a young child sexually be considered a 'preference'? That's just a mental disorder Uh, young child? There are no young children in any of these pictures. These are 20+ year old women who aren't necessarily virgins and know full well what they are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jem's 5,056 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 funny idols above 18+ posing like it gets worse reactions and more negativity than tzuyu's sexy cf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiaraewiwiarae 6,637 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 How is this considered lolita? Just women in their twenties wearing home clothes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deviandrepepe 6,559 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Is saying stuff Lolita when it's not a new trend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimo 4,045 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 8. [+43, -2] Just how much more perverted things have you all seen if you don't think that there is a pedo element to this at all? Wearing Japanese style clothing with skin exposing and a facial expression that makes them seem innocent... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kissxkiss_baby 5,756 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 What exactly makes it Lolita? How old she is? Or is it the clothes? Because this looks like a pretty normal magazine photo-shoot What exactly makes it Lolita? How old she is? Or is it the clothes? Because this looks like a pretty normal magazine photo-shoot It refers to age, I think Lolita stems from the book about with guy falling in love with a very young girl. Also there is a Lolita sub section in anime that sexualizes girls that look very child like. Given that guys name I think that he does draw inspiration from from this genre but there is worse out there, like in Japan when girls doing these type of photoshoots are actually underage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantaji Land 644 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 Am I the only one who think this is art? It's gorgeous...the filters, makeup, clothing, everything... Sure you may get lowkey pedo vibes but these are grown women Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nolie 3,749 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 nope its stellar members oops my bad. they look so much alike(maybe because of the bangs) and the filter(?) is somewhat similar to wjsn teasers.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ethereal 20,923 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 i don't get how this is a "lolita" concept..... i mean, knowing the photographer's previous work it's pretty clear what he's trying to insinuate in his pictures, but just looking innocent yet erotic in itself isn't "lolita". and the girls are not underage so it's not pedophilia. these people need to chill. hate the photographer all you want but y'all are straight up pulling that "this is a lolita concept" stuff out of your asses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugaJam 3,634 Posted January 14, 2016 Share Posted January 14, 2016 before they execute the concept of lolita, please take care of all the actual lolita groups they fawn over all the time, or at least get rid of terms like bagel-girls and innocent glamorous first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.