Gloupipoo 1,619 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 results from this poll http://onehallyu.com/topic/138290-staff-trust-o-meter/ The poll stabilized at 61 vote castings, so I decided to calculate the results and update them as said in the other thread. Results will also indicate the % of voters who selected the options. All percentages were rounded off to the 1st decimal. Here are the results As the graphic above shows, most staff gets mixed reviews. Let's first cover Trust The trust-o-meter indicates they trust (from most to least): Owners - 26 (42.6%) Subbing - 19 (31.1%) Tech - 15 (24.6%) Coordinators - 14 (23.0%) Radio - 13 (21.3%) Awards/Moderators - 9 (14.7%) Events - 6 (9.8%) Moreover, some voters said they trusted only a few staff members but not the others (27) whereas others said they trusted most of the staff but not a few others (14) Trusting most staff - 14 (23.0%) Trusting few staff - 27 (44.3%) Now on to Bias The trust-o-meter indicates they believe the staff that is biased is (from most to least): Moderators/Events - 44 (72.1%) Awards - 34 (55.7%) Coordinators - 30 (49.1%) Owners - 25 (41.0%) Subbing - 16 (26.2%) Radio - 15 (24.6%) Tech - 14 (23.0%) The trust-o-meter indicates they believe the staff that is not biased is (from most to least): Owners - 23 (37.7%) Tech - 20 (32.8%) Subbing - 18 (29.5%) Radio - 16 (26.2%) Coordinators - 11 (18.0%) Awards - 10 (16.4%) Moderators/Events - 7 (11.4%) Nepotism The question was asked as such: Your stance on nepotism?I disagree with it when selecting staff members (here calculated as a yes) I believe it is okay to select staff members that way (here calculated as a no) I'm indifferent Those who disagreed with nepotism - 43 (70.5%) Those who were okay with it - 1 (1.6%) Those who were indifferent - 17 (27.9%) Transparency The question was asked as such: Do you believe the staff should be more transparent in its staff members selection? Yes - 49 (80.3%) No - 0 (0%) Indifferent - 12 (19.7%) What do you think of those results? Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abra 40,910 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 What I want to know is how the awards team can be biased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unit 530 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I feel like you end every post with "Discuss". I didn't vote in the thread btw and am glad you guys trust us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlayingSeohyun 6,688 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Unsurprising results. Though nothing will be substantially altered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pupper 1,408 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I'm not sure what the bias part meant. But in terms of bias in the selection process I honestly think all teams but the newer ones like radioh had some. Alot of the staff were from Hallyu8,part of the same social groups,same chat rooms and etc. Regardless of proof considering why would they admit that...I think it's kinda obvious... Not saying it's a fact but lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNSTD 4,470 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 What I want to know is how the awards team can be biased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloupipoo 1,619 Posted February 3, 2015 Author Share Posted February 3, 2015 I feel like you end every post with "Discuss". I didn't vote in the thread btw and am glad you guys trust us. well I feel if I don't people will just reply random shit instead of discussing the topic at hand aka derail the thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImNana 954 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Someone has a lot of spare time lol Results not surprising btw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My Ship is Black Pearl 552 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 This poll will do nothing. I dont think they care enough to change anything inside - they probably just warn each other. Anyways, I might be wrong too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloupipoo 1,619 Posted February 3, 2015 Author Share Posted February 3, 2015 What I want to know is how the awards team can be biased I just posted those who have some kind of influence/interaction with the members when it comes to their job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fourever 3,231 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 us lowly users cant do much about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloupipoo 1,619 Posted February 3, 2015 Author Share Posted February 3, 2015 Someone has a lot of spare time lol Results not surprising btw Not going to school/working at school does that to me I'd make a great survey person tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North and South 4,680 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 n= 61 is hardly a representative sample from a forum of OH's size. I think the general findings are interesting though, in light of events. It's difficult to determine of these results are significant though, because we have no idea how much or little people trusted staff before the incident. I can't help but be really nerd happy when analyzing stats omg. I feel like I need to re evaluate life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Fructose Yoongi Syrup 7,149 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 #effort Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUILD 3,195 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 What I want to know is how the awards team can be biased Maybe towards which awards get chosen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloupipoo 1,619 Posted February 3, 2015 Author Share Posted February 3, 2015 n= 61 is hardly a representative sample from a forum of OH's size. I think the general findings are interesting though, in light of events. It's difficult to determine of these results are significant though, because we have no idea how much or little people trusted staff before the incident. I can't help but be really nerd happy when analyzing stats omg. I feel like I need to re evaluate life. You could also add that not everyone was required to vote + difference in knowledge of the situation + past experiences with staff + timezones as other influences on the poll and its results. But I think it's interesting regardless. #effort #determination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omniscient 404 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 side eyeing the people who voted no for the events team being biased Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lu-brican't 1,059 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 how interesting and I think being a survey person should be a job for op you seem good with charts/graphs/statistics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImNana 954 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 Not going to school/working at school does that to me I'd make a great survey person tbh I may just PM you when I need help with lab reports and such, you seem pretty nifty with data. Hope you don't mind lmao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloupipoo 1,619 Posted February 3, 2015 Author Share Posted February 3, 2015 I may just PM you when I need help with lab reports and such, you seem pretty nifty with data. Hope you don't mind lmao. lmao no probs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex 7,015 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 that #effort though. *thumbsup* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guava 6,874 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 side eyeing the people who voted no for the events team being biased It was prbly the events team voting that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unit 530 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 I'm not sure what the bias part meant. But in terms of bias in the selection process I honestly think all teams but the newer ones like radioh had some. Alot of the staff were from Hallyu8,part of the same social groups,same chat rooms and etc. Regardless of proof considering why would they admit that...I think it's kinda obvious... Not saying it's a fact but lol I think Subbing and Translations are safest tbh. They don't do anything that can even be considered biased and rly now. Who would want to join these teams? (This is to add to what you are saying btw) well I feel if I don't people will just reply random shit instead of discussing the topic at hand aka derail the thread Oh lol okay then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Maple 9,002 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 interesting stats but like someone else said the sample size is small compared to the amount of users on this site. it would be interesting to see the results if more people were questioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ambi 696 Posted February 3, 2015 Share Posted February 3, 2015 What in the world.. someone should make a drama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.