Jump to content
OneHallyu Will Be Closing End Of 2023 ×
OneHallyu

[KPKF]Infinite's earnings


blckp

Recommended Posts

Instiz: Infinite's earnings this year?


 

5dfc588f066206bbf67ae8fc5db3425f.jpg

According to SM C&C, Woolim's last year earnings were 11.7 billion won. This year's predicted earnings are 12.5 billion won and the next year is 13.5 billion won.

Infinite takes up 88% of Woolim's total earnings. Infinite earned 10.3 billion won last year and predictedly 10.7 billion won this year.

The main sources of Infinite's earnings are overseas fan meetings and overseas concerts. 37.8% of their earnings were overseas earnings.

24.2% (25 billion won) come from events and concerts. Their album sales were 22 billion won and the digital sales were 0.4 billion won.

The earnings from their CFs were 1 billion. This year's predicted earning is 0.7 billion.

In 2010, each member took 48,000,000 won. Last year, each member took 0.6 billion won.

Their earnings are predicted to decrease in 2017. Their predicted earning in 2016 is 10.9 billion won and 5.3 billion won in 2017


=====


- Woolim pays their artists properly. They're a great company for singers

- Infinite grew up a lot ã… ã…  I'm sure $100 of the earnings is from me

- I'll still be fangirling in 2017

- There should be more companies like Woolim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow I am pleasantly surprised that Infinite takes 88% of the earnings. 

Infinite's cut is not 88% of earnings.  They mean that Infinite generates 88% of earnings for the company.

 

In 2013, Woollim earned 11.7B, Infinite earning 10.3B of that.  10.3/11.7*100%=88%.

 

In 2014, Woollim is predicted to earn 12.5B, Infinite generating 10.7B of that, so 10.7/12.5*100%=85.6%.

 

What Infinite's cut is: in 2013, each member took home .6B.  So (7members*.6B/10.3B)*100%=40.8%.

 

EDIT: 48M KRW per member in their debut year really is not bad at all... of course I don't think there was a real point that they weren't doing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Infinite takes up 88% of Woolim's total earnings.

 

Er, I am confused. People seem to take this to mean that Woolim is paying Infinite 88% of earnings, but I read that to mean that of all Woolim's artists, Infinite produces 88% of Woolim's total income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infinite's cut is not 88% of earnings.  They mean that Infinite generates 88% of earnings for the company.

 

In 2013, Woollim earned 11.7B, Infinite earning 10.3B of that.  10.3/11.7*100%=88%.

 

In 2014, Woollim is predicted to earn 12.5B, Infinite generating 10.7B of that, so 10.7/12.5*100%=85.6%.

 

What Infinite's cut is: in 2013, each member took home .6B.  So (7members*.6B/10.3B)*100%=40.8%.

 

EDIT: 48M KRW per member in their debut year really is not bad at all... of course I don't think there was a real point that they weren't doing well.

oh..okay got it! Thanks. The phrasing was a little misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Er, I am confused. People seem to take this to mean that Woolim is paying Infinite 88% of earnings, but I read that to mean that of all Woolim's artists, Infinite produces 88% of Woolim's total income.

That's what it is... but only one person (either here or in the knetz comments) has actually explicitly said they took it that way.  .6B KRW per member is still making a very good living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason I was sure the title said "earrings". I opened the page, scrolled down and saw "Infinite takes up 88% of Woolim's total earrings" and thought "do they really wear that many earrings? What?"

 

:rlytearpls:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to the clarification before, we don't know if 0.6 billion won is a decent percentage for 2010 (they didn't say what they earned in 2010) nor if it was distributed between the members, nor if it is gross income or if anything is taxed (forgive me, I have no idea if income is taxed in Korea in the same way as the US).

 

Who suddenly decided to release this info? lol We don't even know if the figures were reported accurately. A "cover your ass" move, maybe?

 

Edit: nvm, I read it meant 0.6 bill for each member. Still though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10.9 billion won to 5.3 billion won in one year??  :unimpressed:

Hm, in 2017 Sunggyu will be... 28.  Perhaps he plans to enlist at that point, so it's not merely an extrapolated decline in earning power or whatever.  Or maybe they have 7-year contracts and they're not assuming everyone will renew (though I don't see why they wouldn't) so they're not counting on it; they debuted June 9, so if they're not assuming there will be any decline in popularity/earning power then 5.3B is basically half a year in earnings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And considering standard cost of living, that may not be that much...

 

That is a lot of money actually. The members have already bought their families houses and cars with their earnings. 

 

For comparison's sake, here's an article from last August that goes into Infinite's earning's and compares them to 2PM's. As we know 2PM earn quite a lot of money for an idol group, and apparently if you take away 2PM's advertising and acting revenue, Infinite's earning's and 2PM's are very similar.

 

http://www.kpopstarz.com/articles/37963/20130816/infinite-member-earning-how-much-do-they-make.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a lot of money actually. The members have already bought their families houses and cars with their earnings.

 

For comparison's sake, here's an article from last August that goes into Infinite's earning's and compares them to 2PM's. As we know 2PM earn quite a lot of money for an idol group, and apparently if you take away 2PM's advertising and acting revenue, Infinite's earning's and 2PM's are very similar.

 

http://www.kpopstarz.com/articles/37963/20130816/infinite-member-earning-how-much-do-they-make.htm

Cars and homes can be bought with credit/loans though. Not even wealthy people pay off these purchases in full (sometimes it's better when you don't). That's why you hear about wealthy people losing their houses in a downturn. You can't "lose" a purchase that is paid off in full.

 

I guess it just seems really suspicious to me that this came out after the ZEA thing lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And considering standard cost of living, that may not be that much...

That's bullshit.  Seoul can be expensive but if they're in poverty after earning over half a million dollars in a year, even if it's before taxes, they'd have to be idiots.  It's like this whining: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/09/10/1328621/-The-Wall-Street-Journal-cries-about-the-poverty-of-making-400-000-a-year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Back to Top