raspberry84

I am forever confused by this. I want them to sit me down and explain the thought process that went behind this. The directions that were given when they were shooting this. "Ok, look down at his penis and then make eye contact while smiling."

But there is nothing to suggest the statue has both features. Overall, it's a masculine statue. It doesn't have breasts as suggested and clearly is meant to represent Tae (who is male). This was inspired by a story but it's only an inspiration.

I think it's a trick of the light. I don't see any different in the size of the breast. I don't actually see any changes between the face and body in style or the amount of masculine/feminine features. They all seem to go together smoothly to me. Overall this seems more masculine with it's features and that is confirmed when we discover it's meant to represent Tae.

Jumping in here but it is in no way bierasure to see the statue in BS&T as male. If it was just the statue I could see this argument (even if it has "traditionally" male features gender is far more complicated than that). But the video very heavily implies that the Tae and the statue are one and the same. Tae = Statue Therefore, Statue = Male. And one of the members didn't have to stand in. They didn't have to show a member in this scnen or they could have hired another actor/actress. Hell, they could have left it at his JUST kissing the statue. The scene was shot and edited in a way to very explicitly make the connection between the two. That also in no way invalidates bisexuality to suggest it was a kiss between two men.