eplizo

I hate to be a bitch, but Jinhawn is%2

I hate to be a bitch, but Jinhawn is obviously only a confirmed member of the group because of pity/senoirity. In reality, he doesn't have THAT much to offer. He isn't even slightly stereotypically good-looking, his vocals are sub-par, and his dancing isn't anything special compared to the other members. He doesn't even compose or producer like BI or maybe Bobby (not to my knowledge at least). I think he might have written lyrics before, but I'm sure they weren't anything stellar. It's not like he possesses the best leadership skills in the group either. It says a lot when the youngest dongsaeng becomes the leader over you lol.

Well I was just getting technical since you were explaining to someone, and your wording could possibly throw them off. Instead of misleadingly saying falsetto "can't be resonate", just say it can't be AS resonante as head voice. Saying it any other way might throw off someone who's new it all. I never inferred that everyone did that. Where did i even generalize? I said some people in this thread do it; and they do..... lol. Yea, I didn't intend to be arrogant about it. I just happen to put "lol" and "lmao" at the end of lots of things out of habit lol. You guys just read a bit too much into it. I'm not trying to be hostile.

I'm not trying to be bitchy; I'm trying to be honest. I even apologized for potentially sounding demeaning, so no need to take is harshly or personally, if you are lol. You SPECIFICALLY said "falsetto can't be resonant, only head voice could be resonant", so, yes, technically that IS flat-out incorrect. "in that case then any projected sound would be resonant, which isn't the case." ^ this also is not true. All projected vocal sound IS resonant to some extent or another. It's just a matter how resonant it is. There's a difference between mininmally resonant, and not resonant at all. As I said before, falsetto doesn't have the same potential resonance as head voice, but it can be well-resonant as far as falsetto goes. Tone doesn't have to be optimally resonant to be resonant. There's too much to mention, and I don't have the time to go digging through this thread, but on the topic of resonance, I see people talking about it without truly understand it apparently. Also, on the topic of vocal classifications, those classicalifications are most often reserved for classical music because they are there to distinguish which classical repetioire ones voice can handle. It's quite easily to tell a soprano, mezzo-soprano, and contralto apart regardless of genre because of their tessitura, and most of you all here do that pretty well, but when it comes to ,say, specific mezzo-soprano facher, it's near impossible to classify voices which are quite obviously minimally trained in a classical sense. The attributes displayed by a lot of these voices are even quite possibly due to a lack in technique rather than their supposed "fach". I don't mean offense by any of this by the way, since you're all just discussing and trying to help one another which is better than nothing.

That's not true...... lol. Falsetto can very well be resonant. ALL human vocal sound is resonant to an extent otherwise no tone would be produced. Falesetto in particular resonates differently to head voice simply because the chords adduct differently, but the vibration and sound are still amplified by the resonators. Head voice IS potentially more resonant than falsetto, but to say falsetto can't be resonant is flat-out incorrect lmao. I keep seeing some misinformation being spread around here. I apologize if I sound demeaning, but if you guys plan on helping inform, please make sure your info is as accurate as possible. You don't want to confuse or outright misinform someone.

I watched this a bit ago literally minutes after you posted it lol. It's Legendary.