Jump to content


Photo

18 vaginas censored on the cover of a student magazine

news student mag sydney censorship

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
21 replies to this topic

#1 cookiedoughhh

cookiedoughhh

    Global Superstar

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 718 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:41 PM

Student mag in sydney tried to start a discussion on vaginas. They wanted to show that vaginas are not something to be ashamed of and should not be censored.
 
The cover was censored by the univerisity. Some feminist groups are outraged by the censorship and calling the Sydney univeristy "a bunch of limey cunts".

 

 

 

 

Eighteen women are crammed into Sydney University's Women's Room. They wait anxiously for the photographer to arrive. Most don't know each other, but they are about to be united in an unusual way. They start to talk, light-heartedly at first, but increasingly earnestly, about their vaginas.

 
"I have no idea what mine looks like – I haven't got the mirror out in years," confesses one.
 
"I don't want to feel ashamed," says another.
 
Nicholson Museum, Main Quadrangle, Sydney University.
Nicholson Museum, Main Quadrangle, Sydney University. Photo: Oliver Strewe
 
Someone makes an easy joke about how annoying periods are, everyone chuckles, and the camaraderie grows. By the time the photographer arrives, they're ready for their close-ups.
 
Advertisement
The vulvae of these 18 women now sit proudly on the cover of this week's edition of Honi Soit, Sydney Uni's weekly student newspaper. Or rather they did until lawyers for the Students Representative Council advised the SRC president (who bears ultimate liability for what Honi publishes) to take all 4,000 copies off the stands and guillotine the cover.
 
The reason? The black bars which we were made to use to hide the "offensive" parts and avoid prosecution came back from the printers ever so slightly transparent.
 
The idea was born soon after we were elected as the 2013 Honi editors. Honi has a proud history of radicalism. Because of its student audience and the fact that it is published by a student-run organisation, it is uniquely placed to run interesting, edgy material. We wanted to use this opportunity to do something positive for women. We weren't aware it could be a criminal conspiracy.
 
The photography and design certainly didn't feel criminal. The women involved only felt a little freer. Afterwards, most admitted they had self-consciously worried about their pubic hair and the size of their labia. A few confessed that they had done a little extra "landscaping" in preparation. Women who knew that they should feel comfortable the way they were naturally, but somehow couldn't walked away a little more relaxed.
 
Indeed the cover’s purpose was to help women relax. By presenting 18 incredibly different vulvae, we hoped to demonstrate to our (young) women audience that their own vaginas were normal, that they needn't worry that they were ugly. We also wanted to say that women need not always be sexual, to be on display for men. These were not the bare, tucked-in vulvae of pornography, but the full gamut of ordinary women.
 
Covering those images and then seizing all printed copies from the public eye because of a fear that the images were criminally "indecent" perversely reinforced everything we were fighting. Acted out in this way, the law told women that their bodies were offensive and that they had to hide.
 
It's disappointing that the law operates to prevent students at a liberal university from seeing pictures of genitals, but this isn't just about censorship.
 
A number of people have pointed out that we would have encountered similar problems had we tried to publish a cover full of penises. Our society does have difficulty looking at genitalia, both male and female, and a #penissoit would have probably proved that just as well as #vaginasoit (although Honi did print a penis on the cover in a 1993 edition, with no legal consequences).
 
However, the fear that our cover was indecent was inflamed by the fact that it displayed female genitals.
 
Vaginas are hidden, only ever seen in a sexual light. Due to plain anatomy, women rarely see their own bodies. To do so they must go to the effort of locating a mirror and actively looking. And because they're hidden, pornography has a monopoly on creating cultural norms of what an attractive vagina might look like, leading to worrying trends of hairlessness and labiaplasty.
 
And the penis? Dick jokes are common. Penis graffiti is everywhere. Men are free to adopt their penis as an emblem of their masculinity (see Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines video clip, which proclaims that “ROBIN THICKE HAS A BIG DICK”).
 
I suspect that if our cover had featured male genitals instead of female, nobody would have described it, as one male student did, as "pornographic", a "lewd and repulsive act" that was "inappropriately graphic". Nobody would have claimed the genitals were disgusting or ugly. And if they were flaccid, I doubt anyone would have minded at all.
 
Censorship is frustrating because it gets in the way of us confronting this larger problem.
 
The intention of our cover was not to cause a stir. We did not aim to outrage people or make headlines. Our aim was, in fact, the opposite. A vulva should be no shocking thing. No one needed to bat an eyelid.
 
 



#2 AnthonyKkoKko

AnthonyKkoKko

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,374 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:46 PM

no offence but some of those pussies look like they belong to another species of primate...




#3 ImJustaMaisha

ImJustaMaisha

    I love Pon this Wei <3

  • Oh! Press
  • 4,898 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:47 PM

no offence but some of those pussies look like they belong to another species of primate...


Lmfao


#4 Destined2bebossy

Destined2bebossy

    f(an), 4nia, Shawol, SayA, Blackjack, SecretTime

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,829 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:50 PM

no offence but some of those pussies look like they belong to another species of primate...

 

tumblr_ma3gaeDUTW1qgkzcm.gif




#5 creampuff

creampuff

    TM's Captain Creampuff

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,648 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:51 PM

I cannot unsee that :horror:


#6 SchoolNote

SchoolNote

    CL's Fappycakes ≧◡≦♥

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,397 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:53 PM

:omgwtf:  Some of those vaginas.....




#7 The King

The King

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,229 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:57 PM (Edited by The King, 21 August 2013 - 10:57 PM.)

I suspect that if our cover had featured male genitals instead of female, nobody would have described it, as one male student did, as "pornographic", a "lewd and repulsive act" that was "inappropriately graphic". Nobody would have claimed the genitals were disgusting or ugly. And if they were flaccid, I doubt anyone would have minded at all.

 

Lies all around in this paragraph.




#8 Chunface

Chunface

    Married to CraZy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,090 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 10:59 PM

:omgwtf: :omgwtf:  that hair




#9 skylight

skylight

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,976 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 11:26 PM

:omgwtf: oh dear




#10 Taku

Taku

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,338 posts

Posted 21 August 2013 - 11:33 PM

Lies all around in this paragraph.

 

This x a trillion. 

 

I do not want to see either gender's genitalia thank you very much. 




#11 GoodJoy

GoodJoy

    Superstar

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 454 posts

Posted 22 August 2013 - 12:00 AM

Freakn love hairy pussies  :chu:




#12 blowinfartbubbles

blowinfartbubbles

    Superstar

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 441 posts

Posted 22 August 2013 - 01:17 AM

I've seen a pic of a bunch of cupcake replicas of vaginas more explicit than that.  :rolleyes:

 

and even if the cover was a bunch of penises on display, it would still be lewd and repulsive. 




#13 cookiedoughhh

cookiedoughhh

    Global Superstar

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 718 posts

Posted 22 August 2013 - 03:06 PM (Edited by ShortHairGirl, 22 August 2013 - 03:07 PM.)

wow they removed the pics?? even the censored version? wow




#14 Ditto

Ditto

    Idol

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 219 posts

Posted 22 August 2013 - 09:34 PM

Haha. USYD, funny. 




#15 BigManSam

BigManSam

    Superstar

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 277 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 08:36 AM

Some feminist groups are outraged by the censorship and calling the Sydney univeristy "a bunch of limey cunts".

 

I see the convicts have gotten over their inferiority complex...




#16 abraa

abraa

    Legend

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,870 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 09:00 AM

Is it OK to post the censored version here? (if under a spoiler)




#17 mglsts

mglsts

    Legend

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,143 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 09:21 AM

LOL! Those are not particularly flattering pictures.




#18 Penis Intolerant

Penis Intolerant

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,123 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 09:40 AM

no offence but some of those pussies look like they belong to another species of primate...

 

tumblr_m1t4rhJmQ61qedflvo1_250.gif




#19 Hanah-

Hanah-

    Devoted to Reus' perfection. ❥

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,214 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 02:28 PM

I appreciate their motive to do that. No matter how their bodies look, women are in general way too shy to explore their bodies.




#20 craZy

craZy

    Legend

  • Graphics Coordinator
  • 2,051 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 02:51 PM

Oh goodness...

 

Lies all around in this paragraph.

 

So very much.







Up, Up and Away!